Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1282Hits:18784328Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID114134
Title ProperCoercive diplomacy meets diversionary incentives
Other Title Informationthe impact of US and Iranian domestic politics during the Bush and Obama presidencies
LanguageENG
AuthorDavies, Graeme A M
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper applies theories of strategic conflict avoidance and diversionary war to help explain US-Iranian interactions. The article argues that US attempts at coercive diplomacy have tended to strengthen hardliners in Iran by allowing them to frame opposition to government policies as support for the United States. In particular, US public uncertainty about the advisability of using force against Iran provided both the Supreme Leader and the Iranian President with an opportunity to increase tensions with the United States with little concern about provoking a military strike. The aggressive stance of the Iranian regime is about developing a threat which diverts attention from domestic problems and places it firmly in the arena of the international.
`In' analytical NoteForeign Policy Analysis Vol. 8, No.3; Jul 2012: p.313-331
Journal SourceForeign Policy Analysis Vol. 8, No.3; Jul 2012: p.313-331
Key WordsUS - Iranian Interactions ;  Iran ;  Coercive Diplomacy ;  United States ;  Iranian Domestic Politics ;  Bush Presidencies ;  Obama Presidencies