| ID | 114156 |
| Title Proper | Age of asocial war |
| Other Title Information | democratic intervention and counterinsurgency in the twenty-first century |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Merom, Gil |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Why, in spite of past failures, do liberal democracies continue to intervene militarily and fight counterinsurgency wars? The answer is grounded in learning. Liberal democracies acknowledge past failures, tracing them to the interaction between the events on the battlefield and society at home. Specifically, they identify the educated middle class and its mix of expedient and altruistic motivations as preventing effective military campaigns and victory. Hence, the main effort of liberal democracies is that they aim to fight wars that are divorced from society. At their disposal are advanced military technology, the professional all-volunteer force, proxies and alliance partners, and private military companies. The desocialising effects of these are complemented by control of the media and thereby the flow of information from the battlefield to society. Liberal democracies have found a way to continue to play the violent game of world politics, but they do so less democratically as they fight asocial wars. |
| `In' analytical Note | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 66, No.3; Jun 2012: p.365-380 |
| Journal Source | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 66, No.3; Jun 2012: p.365-380 |
| Key Words | Army Format ; Asocial War ; Embedded Journalism ; Jntervention ; Ground Troops ; Learning ; Liberal Democracy ; Military Technology ; RMA |