Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:386Hits:19884631Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID114431
Title ProperKicking the hornets
Other Title InformationIran's nuclear ambivalence and the west's counterproductive nonproliferation policies
LanguageENG
AuthorDisney, Patrick
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article applies the concept of nuclear ambivalence to the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Nuclear ambivalence differs from other approaches to understanding nuclear proliferation in that it focuses on the deeply misunderstood relationship between the two potential uses of nuclear power: energy and weapons. According to this theory, the civilian applications of nuclear technology cannot be separated from the potential military applications and vice versa. Ambivalence, therefore, extends into the realm of states' nuclear intentions, making it impossible to know with certainty what a potential proliferator's "true" intentions are. This article will demonstrate that the concept of nuclear ambivalence applies in the case of Iran, suggesting that current international nonproliferation efforts run the risk of encouraging rather than discouraging Iranian weaponization. The final section outlines recommendations for policy makers to reverse this counterproductive nonproliferation approach.
`In' analytical NoteNonproliferation Review Vol. 19, No.2; Jul 2012: p.159-175
Journal SourceNonproliferation Review Vol. 19, No.2; Jul 2012: p.159-175
Key WordsNuclear Ambivalence ;  Islamic Republic of Iran ;  Iran ;  Nuclear Power ;  Energy ;  Weapons ;  Nuclear Technology


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text