| ID | 114437 |
| Title Proper | Ambivalent neutral |
| Other Title Information | rereading Sitzerland's nuclear history |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jasper, Ursula |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Traditional analyses of Switzerland's nuclear weapons program often explain both its beginning and its end by merely subsuming it under the broad logic of security calculations: the country originally developed an interest in nuclear weapons due to its precarious security environment after the end of World War II; it ended its nuclear ambitions roughly two decades later when it felt less threatened by external powers. Yet this depiction of the Swiss case brushes aside the historical political context in which Switzerland's nuclear decision-making was embedded. Drawing upon studies in sociology and political theory, this article argues that understanding the Swiss debate on nuclear weapons is possible only if we manage to comprehend the significant political and cultural changes that took place within Swiss society. These changes deeply affected the country's defense and foreign policy conceptions and also altered prevalent notions of neutrality, thereby ultimately foreclosing the nuclear option. In more abstract theoretical terms the article moreover suggests that we need to overcome depictions of objectively given threats or predetermined interests and develop analytical tools that help us disentangle the complex, non-linear ways in which threat perceptions, identities, and preferences evolve and shape states' proliferation policies. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 19, No.2; Jul 2012: p.267-292 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 19, No.2; Jul 2012: p.267-292 |
| Key Words | Switzerland ; Nuclear Weapons ; Proliferation ; Neutrality |