Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:868Hits:19872514Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID114823
Title ProperBeyond tailoring
Other Title InformationNorth Korea and the promise of managed deterrence
LanguageENG
AuthorJackson, Van
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)How can one state maintain deterrence against another state undergoing an uncertain political transition? A debate within fourth wave deterrence theory focuses on whether and when a tailored approach, based on cultural, organizational, and idiosyncratic characteristics of a target state, has the greatest value. Tailored deterrence may not be appropriate under conditions of domestic political uncertainty in the target state, often those most in need of deterring. A more promising alternative for a defending state may be deterrence management. Deterrence management compensates for insufficient or low-confidence assessments of a target's values, organizational structure, power distribution, or cultural idiosyncrasies that prevent employment of tailored deterrence strategies intended to manipulate such factors. To make this case, I combine insights from deterrence theory with an exploration of the uncertain politics of a post-Kim Jong-il North Korea and the unpredictable process of power consolidation. Deterrence management may be applicable in cases of imperceptible leadership transitions in other target states. While no panacea, the deterrence management approach reinforces stability while remaining flexible enough to accommodate change.
`In' analytical NoteContemporary Security Policy Vol. 33, No.2; Aug 2012: p.289-310
Journal SourceContemporary Security Policy Vol. 33, No.2; Aug 2012: p.289-310
Key WordsDeterrence ;  Political Transition ;  Deterrence Management ;  Deterrence Theory ;  North Korea ;  Kim Jong-il


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text