| ID | 114824 |
| Title Proper | What use overwhelming air superiority? a tale of two campaigns |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Steiner, Barry H |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Longer wars between mismatched opponents often end with the militarily weaker side showing unexpected strengths. This article tests this tendency in two short wars in which overwhelming force superiority was applied in massive air attacks. Operation Enduring Freedom (the 2001 American campaign in Afghanistan) and Operation Cast Lead (the 2008-2009 Israeli campaign in Gaza) both began with air offensives that shifted to air-supported ground combat, but Enduring Freedom (a Type A operation) gave priority to aerial attack, while in Cast Lead (Type B) air operations primarily paved the way for ground combat. Neither campaign was fully decisive, suggesting that the residual capabilities of weaker combatants apply to short as well as protracted hostilities. The Type A attack was decisive against the Taliban, but not against al Qaeda. The more intensive Type B case, Cast Lead, did not lead to greater decisiveness than its counterpart, with Israel emphasizing force demonstration to enhance deterrence of attack, yet not seeking to destroy Hamas's residual military capability. The problem of translating large military superiority into decisive war results is also evident recently in more common, stretched out, and restrained airpower use supporting higher-priority ground combat, as in NATO's 2011 intervention in Libya and the aerial drone campaign in Pakistan supporting NATO war making in Afghanistan. |
| `In' analytical Note | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 33, No.2; Aug 2012: p.311-336 |
| Journal Source | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 33, No.2; Aug 2012: p.311-336 |
| Key Words | Air Superiority ; Massive Air Attacks ; American Campaign in Afghanistan - 2001 ; Israeli Campaign in Gaza - 2008-2009 ; Al Qaeda ; Hamas ; Afghanistan ; Israel |