ID | 115335 |
Title Proper | Battle for Jaffa, 1948 |
Language | ENG |
Author | Golan, Arnon |
Publication | 2012. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Modern armies conduct military operations in urban areas, but rarely do so willingly. Military commanders prefer fighting in open terrain in which forces freely maneuver and use firepower, rather than in urban areas in which obstacles such as tall buildings, narrow streets, and non-combatants hinder control of the battlefield. Most professional military literature recommends refraining from fighting in urban areas and considering urban battles an unfortunate aberration to be avoided in the future. Deliberate choice of an urban battlefield is quite exceptional, deriving mostly from strategic needs or due to the symbolic value ascribed to a particular city or town. Most decisive battles of the first Arab-Israeli war in 1948 were fought in open areas. However, strategic and political considerations, as well as cultural and sentimental, caused both sides to fight in cities and towns, such as in the case of Jaffa and Tel Aviv metropolitan area, Palestine's major economic center and a main road junction. Both cities also held sentimental value: the dynamically developing modern Jaffa was a symbol of an emerging Palestinian nation while Tel Aviv, the "first Hebrew city," was the Zionist ideal of urban development. |
`In' analytical Note | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 48, No.6; Nov 2012: p.997-1011 |
Journal Source | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 48, No.6; Nov 2012: p.997-1011 |
Key Words | Urban Development ; Tel Aviv ; First Hebrew City ; Jaffa ; Palestine ; Arab - Israeli War |