| ID | 115340 |
| Title Proper | Twentieth-century arms control policy May fail in the twenty-first |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Nanos, G Peter |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Beginning in the early 1980s, the central theme of U.S. diplomacy with the former Soviet Union and now Russia has been the mutual reduction of the overwhelming destructive capability of strategic arsenals as a means to reduce the primary threat to America. The record of accomplishment is impressive. Not only are the allowed force levels in the latest agreement dramatically lower than their Cold War peaks, the New START Treaty continues and builds on protocols that have created unprecedented transparency and confidence. It is time to ask: What is the next step that will have the highest payoff in reducing the nuclear threat to America? Between the United States and Russia, where the strategic calculus is very well understood, further bilateral stockpile reductions in the near term will lead to only limited improvements in national security. Priority and resources should be shifted to understanding how to deal with the emerging realities of a multipolar nuclear world, where risks can be just as grave and the techniques for managing them are not as well understood. |
| `In' analytical Note | Comparative Strategy Vol. 31, No.4; Sep-Oct 2012: p.322-330 |
| Journal Source | Comparative Strategy Vol. 31, No.4; Sep-Oct 2012: p.322-330 |
| Key Words | Soviet Union ; Russia ; America ; US Diplomacy ; New START ; Nuclear Threat ; United States ; National Security ; Multipolar Nuclear World |