| ID | 116175 |
| Title Proper | Evaluating the quality of intelligence analysis |
| Other Title Information | by what (Mis) measure? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Marrin, Stephen |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Each of the criteria most frequently used to evaluate the quality of intelligence analysis has limitations and problems. When accuracy and surprise are employed as absolute standards, their use reflects unrealistic expectations of perfection and omniscience. Scholars have adjusted by exploring the use of a relative standard consisting of the ratio of success to failure, most frequently illustrated using the batting average analogy from baseball. Unfortunately even this relative standard is flawed in that there is no way to determine either what the batting average is or should be. Finally, a standard based on the decision-makers' perspective is sometimes used to evaluate the analytic product's relevance and utility. But this metric, too, has significant limitations. In the end, there is no consensus as to which is the best criteria to use in evaluating analytic quality, reflecting the lack of consensus as to what the actual purpose of intelligence analysis is or should be. |
| `In' analytical Note | Intelligence and National Security Vol. 27, No.6; Dec 2012: p.896-912 |
| Journal Source | Intelligence and National Security Vol. 27, No.6; Dec 2012: p.896-912 |
| Key Words | Quality of Intelligence Analysis ; Expectations of Perfection ; Purpose of Intelligence Analysis ; Intelligence |