| ID | 116250 |
| Title Proper | British ways of counter-insurgency |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hughes, Matthew |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This essay introduces the special issue, drawing together the different studies around the central theme of the nature of the force used by Britain against colonial insurgents. It argues that the violence employed by British security forces in counter-insurgency to maintain imperial rule is best seen from a maximal perspective, contra traditional arguments that the British used minimum force to defeat colonial rebellions. It shows that the use of force became more difficult especially after the Amritsar massacre in 1919. The presence of white settlers in counter-insurgencies - such as in Kenya in the 1950s - accelerated abuse by security forces and complicated the measured use of force against insurgents by the colonial state. The article concludes by drawing lessons from the British experience of counter-insurgency to unconventional military operations today, suggesting that in some situations the use of maximal force is still an option in counter-insurgency. |
| `In' analytical Note | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 23, No.4-5; Oct-Dec 2012: p.580-590 |
| Journal Source | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 23, No.4-5; Oct-Dec 2012: p.580-590 |
| Key Words | Minimum Force ; Violence ; Counter - Insurgency ; Amritsar ; Hanslope Park ; British Army ; Hearts and Minds |