Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:761Hits:19999566Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID116353
Title ProperGender, representation and power-sharing in post-conflict institutions
LanguageENG
AuthorByrne, Siobhan ;  McCulloch, Allison
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)An emerging tension characterizes conflict resolution practice: promoting power-sharing between ethnic groups while simultaneously mandating women's inclusion in peace processes and in post-conflict institutions. Scholars of ethnic conflict have not adequately theorized the gender implications of power-sharing, and practitioners have failed to implement mechanisms that would make power-sharing representative of constituencies beyond ethno-national cleavages. There is no substantive reason why the representation of women and ethnic groups should be in tension. Nevertheless, gender is often ignored in the power-sharing literature and gender-mainstreaming practices appear irreconcilable with power-sharing practice. Drawing on three cases of post-conflict power-sharing - Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, and Northern Ireland - this article identifies reasons why this tension remains in practice, especially the overriding emphasis in power-sharing on ethno-nationalist elites and conflict protagonists.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Peacekeeping Vol. 19, No.5; Nov 2012: p.565-580
Journal SourceInternational Peacekeeping Vol. 19, No.5; Nov 2012: p.565-580
Key WordsGender ;  Representation ;  Power - Sharing ;  Post - Conflict Institutions ;  Ethnic Conflict ;  Northern Ireland ;  Bosnia and Herzegovina ;  Burundi ;  Ireland


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text