| ID | 116363 |
| Title Proper | Choosing sides in the Horn of Africa |
| Other Title Information | Wikileaks, the Ethiopia imperative, and American responses to Post-9/11 regional conflicts |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lefebvre, Jeffrey A |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The United States has faced at times the policy dilemma of seeing conflict erupt between two countries with which it maintains friendly diplomatic relations. The bureaucratic biases of relevant agencies can play an important role in determining whether to choose sides or remain neutral in these conflicts. In the early 1960s the Africa Bureau adopted a pro-Ethiopia bias that shaped American policy in the Horn of Africa. With the insights provided by the 2010 Wikileaks cables, this analysis explores how the "Ethiopia imperative" affected three inter-related American policy decisions in the Horn of Africa in the early twenty-first century: the decision to support Ethiopia despite its refusal to abide by a legally binding decision that favoured Eritrea following the 1998-2000 Eritrea-Ethiopia border war; to give Ethiopia what amounted to a "blank cheque" to invade Somalia in December 2006 and overthrow the Council of Islamic Courts (CIC); and to confront and isolate Eritrea diplomatically for waging proxy war against Ethiopia in Somalia. |
| `In' analytical Note | Diplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 23, No.4; Dec 2012: p.704-727 |
| Journal Source | Diplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 23, No.4; Dec 2012: p.704-727 |
| Key Words | United States ; Policy Dilemma ; Africa ; Pro - Ethiopia ; Horn of Africa ; Wikileaks - 2010 ; America |