| ID | 116442 |
| Title Proper | Democratic representation and the constituency paradox |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Disch, Lisa |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | That acts of democratic representation participate in creating the interests for which legislators and other officials purport merely to stand gives rise to the "constituency paradox." I elucidate this paradox through a critical reading of Hanna Pitkin's The Concept of Representation, together with her classic study of the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, Wittgenstein and Justice. Pitkin's core insight into democratic representation is that democratic representation is "quasi-performative": an activity that mobilizes constituencies by the interests it claims in their name. I develop this insight together with its implications for contemporary scholarship on the political effects of economic equality. I conclude by arguing that the fundamental democratic deficiency of the US political system goes much deeper than its disproportionate responsiveness to wealthy interests; it is a matter of system biases that foster the formation and expression of those interests, while mitigating against mobilization by those Americans who want inequality to be reduced. |
| `In' analytical Note | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 10, No.3; Sep 2012: p.599-616 |
| Journal Source | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 10, No.3; Sep 2012: p.599-616 |
| Key Words | Democratic Representation ; Constituency Paradox ; US Political System ; Mobilization |