ID | 116805 |
Title Proper | Human security's future in regional cooperation and governance? |
Language | ENG |
Author | Curley, Melissa |
Publication | 2012. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Political elites in East Asia tend to view the concept of human security with scepticism. On the one hand, broader notions of security are acknowledged. However, traditional views on sovereignty and deeply embedded norms relating to non-intervention and consensus politics have fostered conservative views towards parts of the human security agenda that challenge state/elite perspectives. This article identifies and explores this tension, and comments on the potential for different 'strands' of human security to inform future regional cooperation and dialogue, and concludes that human security's breadth continues to fuel an endless debate about its clarity and utility in East Asia. Such confusion is a challenge for its future relevance in the region, both as a conceptual tool and as a policy agenda. |
`In' analytical Note | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 66, No.5; Nov 2012: p.527-541 |
Journal Source | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 66, No.5; Nov 2012: p.527-541 |
Key Words | Association of Southeast Asian Nations ; East Asia ; Human Security ; Responsibility to Protect |