Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1191Hits:19476334Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID117045
Title ProperChina in Darfur
Other Title Informationhumanitarian rule-maker or rule-taker?
LanguageENG
AuthorLee, Pak K ;  Chan, Gerald ;  Chan, Lai-ha
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Most people hold that in its quest for natural resources abroad, China shields rogue states with egregious human-rights record from international opprobrium and sanctions. Its political support for Sudan is a case in point. By examining Chinese perspectives on humanitarian intervention and national sovereignty, this article first argues that Beijing's interests are so multiple and complex that concern about the implications of humanitarian intervention for national integration is more crucial than oil in determining its policy towards Sudan. Paradoxically it asserts that China, a non-democratic country, is more influential than liberal democratic states in making the rules of humanitarian intervention in Darfur because of a lack of political will in the West. In addition, there are early signs that China intends to utilise its newfound power to remake international rules regarding territorial sovereignty. Further development is likely to be shaped by its interactions with the United States.
`In' analytical NoteReview of International Studies Vol. 38, No.2; Apr 2012: p.423-444
Journal SourceReview of International Studies Vol. 38, No.2; Apr 2012: p.423-444
Key WordsUnited States ;  Territorial Sovereignty ;  China ;  International Rules ;  Humanitarian Intervention ;  Darfur ;  Liberal Democratic States ;  Sudan ;  National Sovereignty ;  Human Rights


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text