| ID | 117433 |
| Title Proper | Use of force-stability and instability |
| Other Title Information | India, Pakistan, and China |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bommakanti, Kartik |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article evaluates the source of instability and stability in the India-Pakistan dyad and the Sino-Indian dyad. Challenging the dominant thesis that "means determine ends," the article posits that the use of force by Pakistan renders the India-Pakistan relationship unstable, whereas the Sino-Indian relationship is significantly more stable because of the absence of force. The difference in the state of stability in both dyads is because the weaker state, Pakistan in its conflict with India has failed to accept the verdict of its military defeats. This failure to internalize irreversible military outcomes makes Pakistan particularly susceptible to employing forcible solutions to settle its dispute with India over Kashmir. The reality reverses in the Sino-Indian territorial dispute, in that India has implicitly accepted its military loss against China in 1962 and charted a diplomatic pathway in resolving the boundary dispute. |
| `In' analytical Note | India Review Vol. 11, No.3; Jul-Sep 2012: p.161-190 |
| Journal Source | India Review Vol. 11, No.3; Jul-Sep 2012: p.161-190 |
| Key Words | India ; Kashmir ; China ; Boundary Dispute ; Pakistan ; Military Defeats ; India - Pakistan Relationship ; Sino - Indian Dyad |