Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:448Hits:19961993Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID117452
Title ProperHow do international organizations promote quality of government? contestation, integration, and the limits of IO power
LanguageENG
AuthorBauhr, Monika ;  Nasiritousi, Naghmeh
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)How do international organizations (IOs) promote quality of government (QoG) and reduce corruption? IOs play a central role in most accounts of power in international relations. However, our understanding of how IOs exercise power seldom moves beyond the traditional material-normative dimensions of power. We suggest that an important dimension to understand IO power is the contestation-integration dimension, where IOs can exercise power either by integrating countries into networks of cultural exchange or by contesting existing orders. By analyzing multilateral aid data and building on recent advances in our understanding of the effectiveness of IO anti-corruption work, we apply this framework to show how the contestation-integration dimension helps us understand the success or failure of anti-corruption strategies. We show that when IOs contest existing orders using governance rankings and aid conditionality, they suffer from ideational shortcomings, including lack of objective data and contested policy advice. In contrast, measures based on integration, such as the membership process of IOs or interaction with IOs, are more likely to suffer from internal procedural shortcomings, such as IOs failing to internalize and mainstream the norms that they seek to promote. Our findings have implications for both understanding conditions that limit the diffusion of the international anti-corruption agenda and advancing our knowledge of IO power and its limits.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Review Vol. 14, No.4; Dec 2012: p.541-566
Journal SourceInternational Studies Review Vol. 14, No.4; Dec 2012: p.541-566
Key WordsIO Power ;  Anti - Corruption Agenda ;  Governance ;  Cultural Exchange ;  International Relations ;  Inernational Organization


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text