| ID | 117962 |
| Title Proper | International narcotics law enforcement |
| Other Title Information | a study in irrationality |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Madsen, Frank G |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This year sees the celebration of the first century of international legal provisions against the illicit production and trade of narcotics substances. Accordingly, this is an appropriate moment to evaluate the results obtained. The following essay considers how the international prohibition regime created the crime of drug trafficking. The ensuing function of denied demand is the inescapable basis for the development of organized crime. Second, costs of the regime are critically assessed. The former include institutional costs of law enforcement and of the incarceration of individuals sentenced for drug trafficking and related offences, e.g., violence and financial crimes. The indirect costs are difficult to gauge and impossible to monetize. They include the immense suffering caused by drug trafficking as well as the deterioration of public services due to corruption. The present situation on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border is sufficiently eloquent evidence. Also, narcotics legislation leads to racial tension since the incarceration rates for non-whites for these offences is considerably higher than for whites in the United State and the United Kingdom. Third, political premises are briefly analyzed, namely the implementation of narcotics liaison offices in foreign jurisdictions and the linking of foreign aid and trade privileges to a certification of trade partners' adherence to U.S. antinarcotic drugs law enforcement. One might claim, somewhat counterintuitively, that decriminalization of drug trafficking is not necessary. Drug trafficking has already been decriminalized de facto, if not de jure, by the sheer, constant saturation of the market place. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of International Affairs Vol. 66, No.1; Fall/Winer 2012: p.123-141 |
| Journal Source | Journal of International Affairs Vol. 66, No.1; Fall/Winer 2012: p.123-141 |
| Key Words | Transnational Organized Crime ; International Narcotics Law Enforcement ; Drug Trafficking ; US - Mexico Border ; United State ; United Kingdom ; Foreign Jurisdictions ; Decriminalization |