| ID | 118311 |
| Title Proper | 2012 Defense strategy review & FY 2013 defense budget request |
| Other Title Information | strategy & fiscal constraints |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Cook, James L |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Regardless of whether one is a supporter or a critic, some additional analysis regarding the formulation of the new defense strategic guidance is useful to better understand the rationale for changing defense priorities, the magnitude and impact of these changes within the Department of Defense (DOD), and the review process itself. Specifically, three questions warrant further examination: 1) Why was a DoD-level defense strategy review necessary, given the 2010 Quadrennial Review? 2) What are the implications of this new strategic guidance for the DoD? 3) What are the strategic risks? These questions are addressed by assessing the defense strategic guidance through the lens of strategy and its components: ends, ways, means and risk.
The United States of America is the greatest force for freedom and security that the world has ever known. And in no small measure, that's because we've built the best-trained, best-led, best-equipped military in history - and as Commander-in-Chief, I'm going to keep it that way. |
| `In' analytical Note | Orbis Vol. 57, No.1; Winter 2013: p.41-58 |
| Journal Source | Orbis Vol. 57, No.1; Winter 2013: p.41-58 |
| Key Words | Department of Defense ; United States ; Freedom ; Security ; Barack Obama ; Fiscal Responsibility |