| ID | 118367 |
| Title Proper | Rethinking analytic politicization |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Marrin, Stephen |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Politicization as a term used in intelligence studies is poorly defined, conceptualized and operationalized. Despite the negative connotations associated with the word politicization that equate it with a form of corruption, it is not entirely clear what it is a corruption of. In short, the concept of politicization is for the most part analytically useless. This article critiques the existing status quo conceptualization for being overly broad and insufficiently nuanced, explores the nature of analytic politicization as a subset of politicization writ large, and replaces it with a narrower conceptualization that explains what makes analytic politicization bad and deserving of condemnation. Based on this evaluation, one can conclude that much of what is considered to be politicization in a corrupted sense is really just a naturally-occurring consequence of analysis and interpretation in a policy or political context. |
| `In' analytical Note | Intelligence and National Security Vol. 28, No.1; Feb 2013: p.32-54 |
| Journal Source | Intelligence and National Security Vol. 28, No.1; Feb 2013: p.32-54 |
| Key Words | Politicization ; Intelligence Studies ; Conceptualization ; Rethinking Analytic Politicization ; Intelligence |