Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:345Hits:19942264Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID118369
Title ProperWhy won't they listen? comparing receptivity toward intelligence at Pearl Harbor and midway
LanguageENG
AuthorDahl, Erik J
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)After surprise attacks and other intelligence failures, the complaint is often heard that if only decision-makers had listened more closely to the warnings they had received, disaster might have been avoided. But even though it is generally agreed that intelligence is of little use unless it is received and understood by policymakers, we actually know little about why some leaders are receptive toward intelligence, while others are not. This article argues that the willingness of decision-makers to listen to intelligence depends primarily on two factors: their belief in the seriousness of the issue or threat involved, and their trust in the utility of intelligence. It examines contrasting receptivity toward intelligence in the cases of Pearl Harbor and the Battle of Midway, and suggests that our current models of intelligence-policy relations need to be revised.
`In' analytical NoteIntelligence and National Security Vol. 28, No.1; Feb 2013: p.68-90
Journal SourceIntelligence and National Security Vol. 28, No.1; Feb 2013: p.68-90
Key WordsIntelligence - Policy Relations ;  Pearl Harbor ;  Utility of Intelligence ;  Policymakers ;  Intelligence Failures


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text