| ID | 118951 |
| Title Proper | Eighteenth-century historiographic tradition and contemporary 'Everyday IPE |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Watson, Matthew |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article focuses on Adam Smith's largely sympathetic response to the Rousseauian critique of the moral degeneracy of modern 'economic man'. It thus emphasises his philosophical ambivalence towards commercial society over the textbook IPE presentations which ascribe to him an almost wholly unreflexive market advocacy. In doing so it provides important methodological lessons for the study of Everyday IPE today. Arnaldo Momigliano has identified a decisive break in historical method in the eighteenth century, of which Smith and Rousseau were key exponents. However unwittingly, contemporary Everyday IPE scholars are the spiritual heirs of the eighteenth-century move from writing public histories of the state to writing private histories of unnamed individuals who embody the most recent phase of human sociability. The eighteenth-century economic man was conceptualised in relation to evolving forms of economic organisation, where the economy in turn was thought to reflect the prevailing system of 'manners'. Smith united with Rousseau in the belief that their society's bourgeois politeness allowed materialist ideologies to corrupt the moral autonomy of the individual. The historical method underpinning such concerns also allows Everyday IPE scholars to ground similarly-styled attempts to understand threats to moral autonomy arising from the struggle over economic surplus today. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 39, No.1; Jan 2013: p.1-23 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol. 39, No.1; Jan 2013: p.1-23 |
| Key Words | Historiographic Tradition ; Moral Autonomy ; Economic Man ; Adam Smith ; Commercial Society ; Economic Organisation ; Economy |