Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:468Hits:20676195Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID119449
Title ProperFrom revolutions to constitutions
Other Title Informationthe case of Egypt
LanguageENG
AuthorLang, Anthony F
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article explores the transition from revolutions to constitutions in Egypt. In order to understand the current transition, the article compares events since 2011 to the 1919 constitutional revolution and the 1952 Free Officers' Movement.
In comparing these three revolutionary periods and the constitutions they produced, the article makes two overarching claims: first, a constitution does not arise from the fiat of wise lawgivers or experts in the rule of law. Rather, it emerges from a contentious political process in which competing agents and institutions seek to promote their own interests. This competitive process, however, is actually beneficial to constitution-making, constitutional politics and political life more widely.
Second, the article highlights that while the political dynamics of constitution-making in Egypt reveal domestic politics, the process of constitution-making also demonstrates how such dynamics take place in a global political context. Together, these two claims point up that constitutionalism is just as much a political movement as a legal doctrine.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Affairs Vol. 89, No.2; Mar 2013: p.345-363
Journal SourceInternational Affairs Vol. 89, No.2; Mar 2013: p.345-363
Key WordsEgypt ;  Constitution Revolutions ;  Constitiutional Politics ;  Legal Doctrine


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text