| ID | 119986 |
| Title Proper | Challenging anthropology |
| Other Title Information | anthropological reflections on the ethnographic turn in international relations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lie, Jon Harald Sande |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Ethnography and anthropology are intrinsically linked, but recently other disciplines have started to draw inspiration from anthropological methods. The ongoing ethnographic turn in International Relations has spurred debate on what ethnography is, what it means and entails in practice, and how to apply it in International Relations. Some assert that the ethnographic turn could not have taken place without adopting a selective and antiquated notion of ethnography; others counter that this argument draws on a caricatured version of ethnography. This article offers one anthropologist's reflections on these issues, drawing on ethnographic work within an international organisation and a state apparatus - both of which are areas of study more common in International Relations than in anthropology. This is not an International Relations turn of anthropology, but the practical and methodological challenges it involves are relevant to the ethnographic turn of International Relations and the disjuncture between the ethnographic ideals and anthropological practice. |
| `In' analytical Note | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 41, No.2; Jan 2013: p.201-220 |
| Journal Source | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 41, No.2; Jan 2013: p.201-220 |
| Key Words | Anthropology ; Ethnography ; International Relations ; Method ; Methodology |