| ID | 120460 |
| Title Proper | Insurgents, accidental guerrillas and valley-ism |
| Other Title Information | an oral history of oppositional US soldiers' attitudes toward the enemy in Afghanistan |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Mirra, Carl |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In recent years Western policy towards Afghanistan has been marked by inconsistencies and errors. This article explores United States (US) soldiers' perceptions of the enemy in Afghanistan based on oral history interviews with dissenting combat soldiers who served in the Afghan theatre. By foregrounding soldiers' attitudes towards the enemy, this study includes marginalized voices, often overlooked, that challenge prevailing misconceptions. General David Petraeus, the former commander of US forces in Afghanistan, has argued that significant battlefield decisions are not reserved for generals alone. Petraeus' counterinsurgency programme promotes 'strategic corporals' whose decisions hold important consequences. If strategic corporals are involved in military decision-making, it follows that their interpretation of the conflict may also hold strategic implications for the researcher. Soldiers' views of war are not the final, authoritative verdict. However, this article suggests that these strategic corporals should be included in a complex matrix of interpretation to broaden US understanding of the enemy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 26, No.2; Jun 2013: p.453-468 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 26, No.2; Jun 2013: p.453-468 |
| Key Words | Afghanistan ; Western Policy ; United States ; Counterinsurgency Programme ; Military Decision Making ; Enemy |