| ID | 120673 |
| Title Proper | Central and East European bank responses to the financial crisis |
| Other Title Information | do domestic banks perform better in a crisis than their foreign-owned counterparts? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Epstein, Rachel A |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In the context of transition, nine out of the 10 post-communist countries that ultimately joined the European Union reluctantly privatised the bulk of their banking sectors with foreign capital. The financial crisis of 2008-2009 therefore sparked fears that foreign banks would remove their operations from their Central and East European markets because of a 'home bias' in lending. Such fears were predicated on the widely held beliefs that banks' loyalties lie with their home markets and that it is therefore desirable to protect domestic bank ownership to help combat an economic downturn. This essay casts doubt on the value of banking sector protectionism by comparing foreign and domestic bank behaviour in Central and Eastern Europe during the crisis. The essay finds no consistent relationship between domestic control and either limited economic vulnerability or countercyclical lending. |
| `In' analytical Note | Europe-Asia Studies Vol. 65, No.3; May 2013: p.528-547 |
| Journal Source | Europe-Asia Studies Vol. 65, No.3; May 2013: p.528-547 |
| Key Words | European Union ; Foreign Capital ; Foreign Banks ; Central and East European Markets |