Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1631Hits:19172461Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID120693
Title ProperFundamentally unacceptable yet occasionally unavoidable
Other Title InformationChina's options on external interference in the Middle East
LanguageENG
AuthorShichor, Yitzhak
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)China's 'non-interference' policy is not a new phenomenon. It originates in pre-modern Chinese history when the Empire had been isolated from the rest of the world, as well as in the Mao era when the Chinese-even if they had the will to interfere-did not have the capabilities. Post-Mao and post-Cold War, China has the capabilities but not yet the will to become more involved. Still, economic prosperity and growing political prominence have forced Beijing to compromise. Fundamentally, China's first option remains 'non-interference' and settling of conflicts by the parties concerned. Yet if this fails, then the Chinese prefer an intervention by a regional or professional organisation. If this attempt too, fails, then, reluctantly, Beijing turns to the United Nations Security Council as an option. The worst option is external and independent intervention. All these options are evident in China's Middle East policy.
`In' analytical NoteChina Report Vol. 49, No.1; Feb 2013: p.25-41
Journal SourceChina Report Vol. 49, No.1; Feb 2013: p.25-41
Key WordsArab League ;  African Union ;  UN Security Council ;  Libya ;  Syria ;  Sudan ;  Darfur ;  Peacekeeping ;  Intervention ;  Iran - Iraq War ;  Gulf War


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text