Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:410Hits:19940725Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID120770
Title ProperMutiny and nonviolence in the Arab Spring
Other Title Informationexploring military defections and loyalty in Egypt, Bahrain, and Syria
LanguageENG
AuthorNepstad, Sharon Erickson
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Recent studies of civil resistance indicate that security force defections can heavily influence the outcome of nonviolent uprisings against authoritarian regimes. Yet we know little about why, when, and how mutiny occurs. In this article, I ask: what factors influence the likelihood of military defections during a nonviolent conflict? In reviewing various literatures, I identify ten factors that facilitate or obstruct mutiny. I propose that two of these are particularly influential: (1) whether troops receive economic or political benefits from the regime; and (2) whether troops perceive the regime as fragile, based on the international community's response to the conflict. Specifically, I argue that troops who receive benefits from a regime are more likely to remain loyal while those who receive no such benefits are more likely to defect. However, even the most underprivileged troops are unlikely to defect if they believe that the state is strong enough to withstand a major civilian uprising. Soldiers' perception of regime strength is partly shaped by whether outside nations support the opposition, thereby weakening the state, or send troops to reinforce the regime's control. Using a qualitative comparative method, I illustrate these dynamics through an examination of several Arab Spring uprisings: Egypt, where the military sided with civil resisters; Bahrain, where troops remained loyal to the state; and Syria, where the military split. Then, to encourage more research on this topic, I use these three cases to generate additional hypotheses about defections that others can test against a wider set of cases. I conclude with a discussion of the questions that future researchers should explore and the types of methodological approaches that are needed in this field of study.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Peace Research Vol. 50, No.3; May 2013: p.337-349
Journal SourceJournal of Peace Research Vol. 50, No.3; May 2013: p.337-349
Key WordsArab Spring ;  Civil Resistance ;  Nonviolence ;  Security Force Defections


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text