Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:874Hits:19991014Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID121730
Title ProperChanging definitions of sovereignty in nineteenth-century East Asia
Other Title InformationJapan and Korea between China and the West
LanguageENG
AuthorPark, Seo-Hyun
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The arrival of Westphalian sovereignty principles in nineteenth-century East Asia was not a uniformly transformative "shock" as commonly assumed. The Sino-centric order did not suddenly disappear; rather it lingered and evolved in a gradual and contested process of change. I argue that enduring domestic understandings of sovereign autonomy affected how Westphalian sovereignty was interpreted in Japan and Korea. Even as the regional structure shifted from regional hierarchy under China to a Western-led international state system, the lens of hierarchy-the long-standing sense of vulnerability and the need to attain autonomous status in a world of great powers-remained unchanged. In addition, each ruling regime in East Asia attempted to reconcile Westphalian sovereignty with existing diplomatic practices to protect its own interests within the Sino-centric order, which resulted in a new hybrid system of interstate relations encompassing notions of both equality and civilizational hierarchy. Within each country, contestation on sovereignty occurred in multiple stages, driven by existing security relationships and changing domestic politics debating the competing standards of civilization in the region.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of East Asian Studies Vol. 13, No.2; May-Aug 2013: p.281-307
Journal SourceJournal of East Asian Studies Vol. 13, No.2; May-Aug 2013: p.281-307
Key WordsSovereignty ;  Sino - Centric Hierarchy ;  Standards of Civilization ;  Unequal Treaties ;  Tributary States ;  Japan ;  Korea ;  East Asian Order


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text