| ID | 121753 |
| Title Proper | Horses and hippos |
| Other Title Information | why Italian government bills change in the legislative arena, 1987-2006 |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pedrazzani, Andrea ; Zucchini, Francesco |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Scholars interested in legislative processes pay relatively little attention to the changes made to bills in parliamentary democracies. On the one hand, comparative research has often described parliamentary institutions as ineffectual vis-à-vis cabinets throughout the lawmaking process; on the other hand, for a long time the rational choice literature has focused more on the formal rules regulating amendatory activity than on amendatory activity itself. Hence, very few studies have tried to explain how much government bills are altered in parliament and why. This article investigates the changes made to governmental legislation in Italy. Taking the modifications occurring during the legislative process as the dependent variable, a number of explanatory hypotheses derived from both existing scholarship and original arguments are discussed and tested. This also allows the identification of some usually unobserved aspects of the decision-making process within the cabinet. The findings can also be relevant for comparative research since Italy has been characterised during the period under scrutiny (1987-2006) by two distinct electoral systems, two extremely different party systems (pivotal and alternational), governments with various ideological orientations and range, and both partisan and technical ministers. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Journal of Political Research Vol. 52, No.5; Aug 2013: p.687-714 |
| Journal Source | European Journal of Political Research Vol. 52, No.5; Aug 2013: p.687-714 |
| Key Words | Executive - Legislative Relations ; Lawmaking ; Coalition Governance ; Italian Political System ; Executive – Legislative Relations |