Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:524Hits:19960618Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID121889
Title ProperQuasi-adjudicative dispute settlement mechanism for CEPA
Other Title Informationthe rule of law in trade relations between mainland China and Hong Kong
LanguageENG
AuthorPuig, Gonzalo Villalta
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article analyses the exclusion of the rule of law in dispute settlement from trade relations between Mainland China and Hong Kong. Other than a power-based provision to resolve any problems through consultation, the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) between the Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region does not contain any rules or procedures for the settlement of disputes between the two sides. The politicization of dispute settlement favours the freedom of informality but compromises certainty of implementation, efficiency of consistency, and transparency of justice, all necessary for further and fairer trade creation and economic integration. This article, therefore, calls for the rule of law in trade relations between Mainland China and Hong Kong with a proposal for a quasi-adjudicative dispute settlement mechanism for CEPA that complements the political framework for consultation and negotiation with an adjudicative framework for arbitration and implementation.
`In' analytical NoteChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 12, No.2; Jun 2013: p.281-320
Journal SourceChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 12, No.2; Jun 2013: p.281-320
Key WordsMainland China ;  Hong Kong ;  Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement ;  Quasi - Adjudicative Dispute Settlement Mechanism