| ID | 121896 |
| Title Proper | From Medusa Past Kantolo |
| Other Title Information | testing the effectiveness of Canada's enemy-centric and population-centric counterinsurgency operational strategies |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jardine, Eric ; Palamar, Simon |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Canada's counterinsurgency in Kandahar province, Afghanistan, involved two distinct operational strategies: an initial enemy-centric strategy and, after 2009, a population-centric strategy. Using insurgent-initiated attacks against civilians as a measure for the level of control and security provided by the counterinsurgency, this article tests the effectiveness of these two strategies using a quasi-experimental research design. This article finds that a population-centric counterinsurgency strategy that aimed to provide security to the population rather than destroy the insurgency resulted in the most controlled and secure environment for the civilian population. To the extent that a secure civilian population is important for successful counterinsurgency, the post-2009 population-centric operational strategy of the Canadian Forces, International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), and the United States increased the chances of a successful counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. |
| `In' analytical Note | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 36, No.7; Jul 2013: p.588-608 |
| Journal Source | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 36, No.7; Jul 2013: p.588-608 |
| Key Words | Canada ; Canada's Counterinsurgency ; Kandahar Province ; Enemy - Centric Strategy ; Population - Centric Counterinsurgency ; Afghanistan ; United States ; ISAF |