| ID | 122328 |
| Title Proper | Non lethal industry review |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Military Technology |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Such is the range of options within the domain on Non-Lethal (NL) weaponry, the adding such capability has been a natural extension to larger, traditional defence companies products portfolios and given even smaller, law enforcement based companies a valid reason to enter the lucrative defence market. The need for innovative solutions has also drawn in academic and research organizations not least those with expertise in undet standing of what keep solution NL, while still enabling the effect they cause to be debilitating. |
| `In' analytical Note | Military Technology Vol.36, No.11; 2012: p.56-58 |
| Journal Source | Military Technology Vol.36, No.11; 2012: p.56-58 |
| Key Words | Advanced Interactive Systems (AIS) ; American Systems ; AMTECH ; BCB ; BE Meyers & Company ; BAE Systems ; Beretta ; Boing ; Booz Allen Hamilton ; Carlisle and Finch ; Chemring ; Combined Tactical Systems ; Concurrent Technologies ; Condor ; Diehl Defence ; South West Research Institute ; Esterline Defence Technologies ; Israel Military Industry (IMI) ; General Dynamics OTS ; Mast Technology ; Metal Strom ; Leonard Wood Institute (LWI) ; National Technical Systems (NTS) ; Raytheon ; Rite Solutions ; Rafeel ; Moog ; Rheinmetall ; Safety Management Services ; FN Herstal ; SAVIT ; Scitor ; Saic ; Strategic Innovation Solutions ; Service Engineering ; Taser International ; Thales ; TIAX ; Tri Star Engineering ; TSSi |