Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:634Hits:19902114Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID122488
Title ProperUS presidential elections
Other Title Informationtwo centuries of constitutional continuity and political change-with an analysis of the political geography of Barack Obama's re-election campaign
LanguageENG
AuthorDunne, Michael
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The system for electing the President of the United States remains essentially as it was prescribed in the Federal Constitution drafted in 1787. The individual 50 states (plus the District of Columbia) are accorded a number of votes in the (so-called) Electoral College; each state's Electoral College vote is then attributed to the candidate gaining a plurality (most) of the popular vote in that state; and the candidate with a majority (50% + 1) of these aggregated Electoral College votes is declared the incoming president. What has changed have been the methods of nominating the candidates, chief of which are the political parties from the nineteenth century with their stage-managed quadrennial conventions and the primary/caucus campaigns from the twentieth century which precede and now determine the formal nomination. President Obama's 2012 re-election campaign showed both the crucial importance of the much-maligned Electoral College in winning the presidency and the demographic divisions hidden in the larger American political landscape.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Quarterly Vol. 84, No.2; Apr-Jun 2013: p.265-277
Journal SourcePolitical Quarterly Vol. 84, No.2; Apr-Jun 2013: p.265-277
Key WordsUnited States of America ;  USA ;  Federal Constitution ;  Elections ;  Presidential ;  Primary ;  Caucuses ;  Electoral College ;  Barack Obama