| ID | 122815 |
| Title Proper | Does having a kin state Lessen the likelihood of minorities engaging in secessionist mobilization? |
| Other Title Information | an analysis of the moderating influence of kin states |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Nagle, John |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Existing research has demonstrated that the ability of secessionist movements to mobilize is highly contingent on assistance from external actors, especially via transborder ethnic ties. The specific relationship between kin state and kin group is seen as particularly enhancing to opportunities for secessionism/irredentism. Yet, the analysis of data (1989-2011) does not support this claim. Relatively few groups with kin states have engaged in violent secessionism, and these examples are mostly restricted to successor states from Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. Thus, this article argues that there are a number of reasons why the relationship between kin state and group increasingly engenders moderation. These reasons are the following: the failure of irredentism as a policy and idea; the asymmetric and problematic relations between kin state and group; and the protective capacity and the provision of resources by the kin state. As such, while external help is vital for secessionist groups to successfully mobilize, kin states typically provide assistance that fosters restraint and peace among their kin. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol. 19, No.3; Jul-Sep 2013: p.287-309 |
| Journal Source | Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol. 19, No.3; Jul-Sep 2013: p.287-309 |
| Key Words | Kin State Lessen ; Secessionist Mobilization ; Kin States ; Yugoslavia ; Irredentism |