| ID | 123119 |
| Title Proper | Nuclear reductions and Middle East stability |
| Other Title Information | assessing the impact of a smaller US nuclear arsenal |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Russell, James A |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The United States faces a series of strategic and policy conundrums as it attempts to promote strategic stability in the Persian Gulf and the wider Middle East. This article examines the relationship between a reduced US nuclear arsenal and strategic stability in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East. It argues that a series of interrelated political and military factors play a much more significant role in regional security and stability than the US strategic arsenal, which has never, with a few extraordinary exceptions, played a direct role in maintaining regional security. The United States has constructed a system of regional stability based on conventional deterrence and defense that has seen it forward base forces at various installations in the region in combination with efforts to arm, train, and equip host-nation militaries. Nuclear weapons have never played a prominent role in this regional system. Evidence presented in this article suggests that there is no compelling reason for the United States to abandon and/or modify the defensive system of conventional deterrence and defense by adding nuclear-backed guarantees to the mix. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 20, No.2; Jul 2013: p.263-278 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 20, No.2; Jul 2013: p.263-278 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Weapons ; Extended Deterrence ; Middle East ; Iran ; Saudi Arabia ; Gulf Cooperation Council |