Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:349Hits:19889660Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID123146
Title ProperOcean governance, maritime security and the consequences of modernity in Northeast Asia
LanguageENG
AuthorWirth, Christian
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)High economic growth rates, the revolution in telecommunications and the end of the Cold War have brought about rapid and profound changes to the domestic as well as regional environments of Northeast Asian governments. The maritime sphere, where increasingly militarized state boundaries delineate political authority and economic activities link increasingly interdependent communities therein, bears high significance for the study of regional cooperation. This paper looks at how the maritime sphere of Northeast Asia is represented in common political and academic discourses of international relations. It finds that maritime affairs are firmly cast in the language of national security, and that empirical evidence against perceived threats and related security imperatives is often neglected if not completely ignored. The paper argues that the maritime space, due to its special character, has become the stage on which the consequences of modernity appear particularly strong. The relentless quest to develop and control the ocean clashes with the notion of the sea as a space of global trade and communication flow. At the same time, the ocean as an entity itself is excluded from the discourse because it is irreconcilable with the conception of the international system of sovereign territorial units. As a result, the maritime sphere is seen as a dividing element between nations rather than a connecting element, and salient environmental problems of the maritime space remain low on political and academic agendas. This is also a consequence of mainstream methods of political science that continue to reproduce discourses of territorial division and fail to offer alternative approaches suitable for the study of contemporary Northeast Asia.
`In' analytical NotePacific Review Vol. 25, No.2; May 2012: p.223-245
Journal SourcePacific Review Vol. 25, No.2; May 2012: p.223-245
Key WordsNortheast Asia ;  Maritime Sphere ;  Energy Security ;  Sea Lane Security ;  Environmental Governance ;  Territorial Sovereignty


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text