Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1095Hits:19623891Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID124117
Title ProperAll mistakes are not equal
Other Title Informationintelligence errors and national security
LanguageENG
AuthorGartner, Scott Sigmund
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Strategic situations create motivational biases that help to predict the type of errors intelligence communities are more likely to commit (Type I errors predict behavior never observed, while Type II errors fail to predict behavior later observed). When the dangers of inaction are low and the cost of action high, the intelligence community is more likely to fail to predict threats (Type II error). If the dangers of inaction are high and the costs of military action low, it is more likely to predict mistakenly threats never observed (Type I error). Studies of US and Israeli decision-making and analyses of two new experimental studies support this theory. The key is to recognize the incentives for error and to develop systems that, at worst, lead to intelligence errors (mistakes consistent with a state's national security needs) and not intelligence failures (errors contrary to national security requirements).
`In' analytical NoteIntelligence and National Security Vol. 28, No.5; Oct 2013: p.634-654
Journal SourceIntelligence and National Security Vol: 28 No 5
Key WordsNational Security ;  United States ;  Israel ;  Intelligence Community


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text