Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1580Hits:19683441Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID124275
Title ProperNarratives of Buddhist legislation
Other Title InformationTextual authority and legal heterodoxy in seventeenth through nineteenth-century Burma
LanguageENG
AuthorLammerts, Christian D
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)For more than a century scholars of central and western mainland Southeast Asia have sought to characterise the status of dhammasattha - the predominant genre of written law from the region before colonialism - and define its authority vis-à-vis Pali Buddhism. For some, dhammasattha texts represent a predominantly 'secular' or 'customary' tradition, while for others they are seen as largely commensurate with, if not directly derived from, the religio-political ideas of a cosmopolitan and purportedly canonical 'Therav?da'. However, scholarship has yet to investigate the way that regional authors during the late premodern period themselves understood the character and legitimacy of written law. The present article examines seventeenth through nineteenth-century Burmese narratives concerning the genealogy and status of dhammasattha to advance a pluralist conception of the relationship between law and religion in Southeast Asian history. This analysis addresses a historical context where ideas concerning Buddhist textual authority were in the process of development, and where there were multiple and competing discourses of legal ideology in play. For elite monastic critics closely connected with royalty, dhammasattha stood in problematic relation to authoritative taxonomies of scripture, and its jurisprudence was seen to contradict authorised accounts of the origin and nature of Buddhist law; the genre thus required reform to be brought into alignment with what were construed as orthodox legal imaginaries. The principal hermeneutic move these monastic commentators performed to achieve this involved redescribing dhammasattha in light of such accounts as a variety of Buddhist royal legislation and written law as the prerogative of the Buddhist state.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of South East Asian Studies Vol.44, No.1; 2013: p.118-144
Journal SourceJournal of South East Asian Studies Vol.44, No.1; 2013: p.118-144
Key WordsBurma ;  Myanmar ;  Buddhist States ;  Dhammasttha ;  Pre Colonialism ;  Religion ;  Religio - Political Ideas ;  Theraveda ;  Pali Buddhism ;  Central and Western Mainland ;  Southeast Asia ;  Oceania ;  ASEAN ;  History - 19th Century ;  History - 17th Century ;  Buddhist Textual ;  Legal Ideology ;  Historical Context ;  Buddhist Law ;  Heterodoxy ;  History - 16th Century ;  King Pindale