| ID | 124360 |
| Title Proper | Is Jerusalem really negotiable? |
| Other Title Information | an analysis of Jerusalem's place in the peace process |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Baker, Alan |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | On August 21, 2012, Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas, referring to "the alleged [Jewish] Temple" in Jerusalem, stated that "there will be no peace, security, or stability unless the occupation, its settlements and settlers will be evacuated from our holy city and the eternal capital of our state."1 This statement, basically denying any Jewish linkage or right to Jerusalem, uttered by the head of the Palestinian Authority who is considered in the international community to be moderate and reasonable, serves as an example of the tremendous political, historical, psychological, legal, and religious challenge that the issue of Jerusalem poses to the Middle East negotiating process. This study analyzes the various aspects of this challenge, with a view to determining why a resolution of the Jerusalem question has defied all past negotiators, raising serious questions about the possibility of reaching agreement between the parties regarding Jerusalem. Beginning with a brief summary of the significance of Jerusalem to each religious community as well as to the world at large, this study analyzes the various international instruments making reference to Jerusalem, and lists proposals published over the years for solving the issue of Jerusalem. |
| `In' analytical Note | Jewish Political Studies Review Vol.24, No.3-4; 2012: p.72-95 |
| Journal Source | Jewish Political Studies Review Vol.24, No.3-4; 2012: p.72-95 |
| Key Words | Israeli-Palestinian Conflict ; Diplomacy ; International Relations ; Conflict Resolution ; Israeli-Palestinian Relations ; Political Psychology ; History ; Jerusalem ; Mahmoud Abbas ; Jewish ; Religion ; Westren Wall ; International Negotiation - Israel |