| ID | 124365 |
| Title Proper | Why is Israel's presence in the territories still called "occupation"? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Sharon, Avinoam |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The term "occupation" is often employed politically, without regard for its general or legal meaning. The use of the term "occupation" in political rhetoric reduces complex situations of competing claims and rights to predefined categories of right and wrong. Iraq was occupied by the Coalition forces from the spring of 2003 until June 28,2004, at which time authority was handed over to the Iraqi Interim Government. At that point, Coalition forces remained in Iraq, but Iraq was no longer deemed occupied. If handing over authority to a Coalition-appointed interim government ended the occupation of Iraq, would the same not hold true for the establishment of the Palestinian Authority and Israel? |
| `In' analytical Note | Jewish Political Studies Review Vol.23, No.3-4; 2011: p.40-64 |
| Journal Source | Jewish Political Studies Review Vol.23, No.3-4; 2011: p.40-64 |
| Key Words | Occupation ; Coalition Forces ; Iraq ; Essays ; Interim Governments ; Sovereignty ; Politics ; Israel ; Middle East ; European Union - EU ; USA ; NATO ; Muslim Countries ; Palestinian Government |