| ID | 124382 |
| Title Proper | Debating American engagement |
| Other Title Information | the future of US grand strategy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Craig, Campbell |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In making their case for maintaining the United States' policy of "deep engagement," Stephen Brooks, John Ikenberry, and William Wohlforth stress that the U.S. security commitment to states in Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia, together with the formidable specter of American preponderance, stifles regional rivalries and hinders the resurgence of a dangerous era of multipolar power politics. The authors contend that a policy of U.S. retrenchment could spark the "return of insecurity and conflict among Eurasian powers," whereas a continuing policy of deep engagement, by "supplying reassurance, deterrence, and active management … lowers security competition in the world's key regions, thereby preventing the emergence of a hothouse atmosphere for growing new military capabilities." In short, they suggest, deep engagement reduces the chances of a major Eurasian war; a new strategy of retrenchment would increase them. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Security Vol.38, No.2; 2013: p.181-199 |
| Journal Source | International Security Vol.38, No.2; 2013: p.181-199 |
| Key Words | US - Grand Strategy ; US - International Security ; US - Internaitonal Politics ; US - International Order ; USA ; Europe ; Middle East ; OPEC ; Asia ; NATO ; EU ; International Relations ; Eurosian War |