Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1804Hits:18237906Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID124389
Title ProperAbiding by the vote
Other Title Informationbetween-groups conflict in international collective action
LanguageENG
AuthorSchneider, Christina J ;  Slantchev, Branislav L
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)We analyze institutional solutions to international cooperation when actors have heterogeneous preferences over the desirability of the action and split into supporters and opponents, all of whom can spend resources toward their preferred outcome. We study how actors can communicate their preferences through voting when they are not bound either by their own vote or the outcome of the collective vote. We identify two organizational types with endogenous coercive enforcement and find that neither is unambiguously preferable. Like the solutions to the traditional Prisoners' Dilemma these forms require long shadows of the future to sustain. We then show that cooperation can be sustained through a noncoercive organization where actors delegate execution to an agent. Even though this institution is costlier, it does not require any expertise by the agent and is independent of the shadow of the future, and thus is implementable when the others are not
`In' analytical NoteInternational Organization Vol.67, No.4; 2013: p.759-796
Journal SourceInternational Organization Vol.67, No.4; 2013: p.759-796
Key WordsCollective-Action Research ;  International Relations ;  Voting Research ;  Anarchism ;  Economic Aspects ;  Transgenic Organisms ;  North Atlantic Treaty Organization ;  Duress -Law ;  International Law ;  International Organization ;  Conflitcts ;  Group Conflicts ;  Civil War


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text