| ID | 124621 |
| Title Proper | What's at stake in the transition debate? rethinking the origins of capitalism and the rise of the West |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Anievas, Alexander ; Nisancioglu, Kerem |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article draws on the theory of uneven and combined development (U&CD) to construct a non-Eurocentric and 'internationalist' analysis of the transition to capitalism. In doing so, we seek to respond to and rethink two challenges: exposures of Eurocentric notions of the 'Rise of the West' on the one hand; and recent critiques of Eurocentric assumptions in the theory of U&CD on the other. Beginning with an assessment of Robert Brenner's Anglo-centric theorisation of capitalism's origins, we argue Brenner's efforts are hamstrung by an omission of international determinations and conditions. In turn, we retrace these missing international factors through an analysis of the Mongol invasions of the 13th/14th centuries, Ottoman imperial expansion in the 15th/16th centuries and the contemporaneous discovery and colonisation of the New World. We argue that each case demonstrates the historically specific forms of U&CD that fed into - and ultimately determined - the developmental trajectory of capitalism in north-western Europe. |
| `In' analytical Note | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 42, No.1; Sep 2013: p.78-102 |
| Journal Source | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 42, No.1; Sep 2013: p.78-102 |
| Key Words | Transition Debate ; Origins of Capitalism ; Eurocentrism ; Uneven and Combined Development ; Marxism ; Rise of the West |