Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1212Hits:18847231Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID125093
Title ProperDomestic politics, news media and humanitarian intervention
Other Title Informationwhy France and Germany diverged over Libya
LanguageENG
AuthorBucher, Jessica ;  Engel, Lena ;  Harfensteller, Stephanie ;  Dijkstra, Hylke
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The European Union member states split over the military intervention in Libya with France, Germany and the UK voting differently in the United Nations Security Council. This article compares news media in France and Germany to better understand the foreign policy decisions of these key actors. Using a newspaper analysis of 334 articles, it shows that the German domestic debate started very late and was much less stable than the French debate. This supports arguments that Germany's decision-making was erratic. The analysis, however, also shows that the German debate was comprehensive and included an extensive discussion of the legitimacy of intervention. This fits in well with the traditional reluctance of German foreign policy elites to support military action.
`In' analytical NoteEuropean Security Vol.22, No.4; 2013: p.524-539
Journal SourceEuropean Security Vol.22, No.4; 2013: p.524-539
Key WordsFrance ;  Germany ;  Humanitarian Intervention ;  Libya ;  Responsibility to Protect ;  Military Action ;  Military Intervention ;  United Kingdom - UK ;  European Union ;  German Foreign Policy ;  International Relations - IR ;  Decision Making - Germany ;  NATO ;  German Debate


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text