| ID | 125440 |
| Title Proper | Financial crisis, contested legitimacy, and the genesis of intra- BRICS cooperation |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Stuenkel, Oliver |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The rise of the BRIC grouping (Brazil, Russia, India, China) is one of the most commented on phenomena in international politics of the past year. Yet little is known about how and why institutionalized cooperation between the BRIC countries began. This article makes two arguments. First, an unprecedented combination in 2008- a profound financial crisis among developed countries, paired with relative economic stability among emerging powers- caused a legitimacy crisis of the international financial order, which led to equally unprecedented cooperation between emerging powers in the context of the BRIC grouping. The BRIC countries were able to use their temporarily increased bargaining power to become agenda setters at the time -culminating in the international Monetary Fund quota reform agreed on in 2010. This shows that even short periods of reduced legitimacy in global governance can quickly lead to the rice of alternative institution - such as, in the case of the crisis that began in 2008, the BRIC platform- which now forms part of the landscape of global governance . Second, intra-BRIC cooperation in the area of international finance enhanced trust among the BRIC countries and led to a broader type of cooperation in many other areas, suggesting the occurrence of spillover effects. Intra-BRICS cooperation (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) is therefore likely to continue, even after the condition that facilitated its genesis- the crisis in the West- have disappeared. |
| `In' analytical Note | Global Governance Vol.19, No.4; Oct.-Dec.2013; p.611-630 |
| Journal Source | Global Governance Vol.19, No.4; Oct.-Dec.2013; p.611-630 |
| Key Words | BRIC ; BRICS ; G-20 ; Global governance ; Legitimacy ; Cooperation ; International politics ; Financial crisis |