| ID | 126023 |
| Title Proper | Wiriyamu massacre of 1972 |
| Other Title Information | response to Reis and Oliveira |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Dhada, Mustafah |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In their text published in May 2012, Bruno Reis and Pedro Oliveira proposed six theses on the massacre at Wiriyamu. They claim or imply that as a location of well-developed villages Wiriyamu did not exist; the massacre as reported might not have happened; although an atrocity may have occurred, the events are too complex to accurately unravel even today; lack of an independent or official inquiry makes the numbers of the dead as reported inaccurate; and that the exigencies of the counterinsurgency determined its context and magnitude within the framework of a civil war. This response examines these six theses, and concludes that Reis and Oliveira fail to advance the narrative. They accept at face value the Portuguese propaganda denying the existence of Wiriyamu as a place, rather than consider data that incontrovertibly proved the existence of Wiriyamu, the massacre, its context, and the overall integrity of the narrative. Finally this text sends a mixed message to its readers by contextualizing it as a case study in civil war. |
| `In' analytical Note | Civil Wars Vol. 15, No.4; Dec 2013: p.551-558 |
| Journal Source | Civil Wars Vol. 15, No.4; Dec 2013: p.551-558 |
| Key Words | Bruno Reis ; Pedro Oliveira ; Wiriyamu ; Massacre - 1972 ; Civil Wars |