| ID | 126331 |
| Title Proper | Control over executive branch information |
| Other Title Information | who judges? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kassop, Nancy |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | You may be forgiven if you associate Lou Fisher's name primarily with his robust defense of Congress's preeminent authority in national security and budgetary matters, or with the idea that courts are only one of three co-equal players in the constitutional dialogue that occurs among all of the branches, or with the related effort to disabuse scholars, the press, and the public of the profoundly incorrect notion that courts have "the last word" in constitutional interpretation. All of these themes are, indeed, key components of Fisher's vast body of scholarly work and public testimony, and they will be forever linked to him as their progenitor. Just as solidly grounded in impeccable research and unassailable logic is Fisher's work on executive power. It fits snugly within his Madisonian emphasis on a government of limited and shared powers, enforced through effective checks and balances, where each institution exercises its respective power while overseeing the other branches to ensure respect for constitutional boundaries. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.3; Jul 2013: p.498-504 |
| Journal Source | Political Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.3; Jul 2013: p.498-504 |
| Key Words | National Security ; Budget ; Fisher |