| ID | 126338 |
| Title Proper | Implicit and explicit measurement approaches to research on policy implementation |
| Other Title Information | the case of race-based disparities in criminal justice |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Borgida, Eugene ; Miller, Andrea |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In 2011, more than 3% of all black men in the United States were imprisoned, compared to only 0.5% of all white men. Among prisoners ages 18 to 24, black men were imprisoned at a rate more than seven times that of white men (Carson and Sabol 2012). It is becoming increasingly urgent for researchers to understand what accounts for these race-based disparities. While a broad constellation of social problems exist that likely contribute to these disparities in concert, different fields of social science tend to focus on different types of explanations. Political scientists and sociologists have tended to emphasize the role of institutional factors, including criminal justice policies and practices, in maintaining race-based disparities. Social psychologists, in contrast, have tended to emphasize individual factors, including punitive responses to crime by jurors, judges, and criminal justice professionals. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.3; Jul 2013: p.532-536 |
| Journal Source | Political Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.3; Jul 2013: p.532-536 |
| Key Words | United States ; Social Science ; Disparities ; Criminal Justice |