Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1596Hits:19792504Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID126341
Title ProperImplicit racial attitude measures in black samples
Other Title InformationIAT, subliminal priming, and implicit black identification
LanguageENG
AuthorOrey, Byron D'Andra ;  Craemer, Thomas ;  Price, Melanye
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)One of the shortcomings of the implicit racial attitudes literature is that it relies almost exclusively on white subjects. Arguably, there are two possible reasons for this. First, these measures were created to address issues of social desirability among whites who harbor negative racial attitudes toward blacks. Second, social desirability pressures and antiblack affect were not viewed as significant among black respondents (see Craemer 2008). This assumption is problematic because it treats black racial attitudes as a monolith. Rather than examining black racial opinion as a complicated and multivalenced set of evaluations about their own group and others, there has been an over emphasis on measures of group solidarity (e.g., linked fate). Understandably, bloc voting and cohesive policy opinions have partially justified this focus; however, the black community is more diverse than presidential election turnout suggests. Price (2009) argues that linked fate, the most common measure for black racial identity, is not adequately problematized as a potentially positive or negative measure of psychological attachment. Here, we hope to build on this literature by using an implicit black identity measure.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.3; Jul 2013: p.550-552
Journal SourcePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.3; Jul 2013: p.550-552
Key WordsImplicit Black Identification ;  Implicit Racial Attitude ;  Black Community ;  Presidential Election ;  Black Racial Identity